Legal Opinion

Pope v. Mergenthaler Linotype Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 4, 1939No. 10387Published

1Opinion

Oh Motion for Rehearing.

In deference to appellee’s motion for rehearing, we have again examined the record and the briefs of counsel in this case, and adhere to our original conclusions. It is not deemed necessary to review the evidence, the salient features of which are outlined in our original opinion.

As we construed the pertinent evidence in this case, an application of the parol evidence rule was called for, and the failure of the trial court to apply the rule required a reversal of the case. The written contract, the execution of which is assumed for the purposb of this decision,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. StraussCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Evans v. SwartzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Parker v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API