Legal Opinion
People v. Tulare Packing Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 14, 1938No. Civ. 1855PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an action wherein plaintiff sought to condemn for highway purposes two parcels of respondent’s property in the city of Tulare. Interests of the defendants were also sought to be condemned. Their cases were evidently tried separately. Hereafter we will refer to the Southern Pacific Railroad Company as the defendant.
The pleadings, findings and judgment designated the tracts of land of defendant to be taken for public use, as “parcel No. 1, first’’, and “parcel No. 1, second’’. We will use these designations in this opinion. The trial court fixed the value of parcel- No. 1, first, at…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. DunmeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Railroad Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Van Wyck v. KnevalsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- New Mexico v. United States Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. Kim W.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Jones v. Tierney-SinclairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Mendez v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Edger v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941