Kenwood Bridge Co. v. Dunderdale
Appellate Court of Illinois
Memorandum.—Assumpsit. In the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Charles R. Starr, Judge, presiding. Appeal from justice’s court; trial by jury; verdict and judgment for appellant; appeal to this court by defendant. Heard at the March term, 1893, and affirmed.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
Appellee having contracted with appellant to install in its shop an electric light plant of a certain description, appellee entered upon the performance of his undertaking and placed in said shops a portion of the promised plant. According to the testimony of appellee he fully performed his contract and the plant was used to light up the shops for about a month.
It seems, however, that the dynamo first ■ supplied was larger than the one contracted for and that appellee, designing to remove it and put in its stead such a machine as the contract called for, sent to the shops another…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Schwartz v. SaundersIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Nelson v. Pickwick Associated Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1889
- Cleary v. SohierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Rawson v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Clark v. ScanlanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Izzo v. City of Loves ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959