Legal Opinion

José Rafael Salazar v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided August 23, 2016No. 0879154PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSELL, Judge.

José Rafael Salazar, appellant, was convicted in a bench trial of felony identity theft 1 in violation of Code § 18.2-186.3. On appeal, appellant argues the evidence was insufficient to establish all of the elements of the offense and that, even if the offense had been proven, the trial court erred in finding that the evidence established a financial loss in excess of the felony threshold of $200. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

“Under well-settled principles of appellate review, we consider the evidence presented at trial in the light most favorable to the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Flores-Figueroa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Parks v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  3. Bolden v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  4. Haskins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  5. Hubbard v. Henrico Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. David Nunez-Vasquez v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. Jose Salazar v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  3. Catherine Tyler v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2022
  4. Jacques Lamar Walker v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2022
  5. Paula Jo Smith v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API