Legal Opinion

Mothershed v. Schrimsher

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 21, 1992No. 9126SC68PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.

At issue in this case is the effect of the North Carolina Slayer Statute’s clause which deems the slayer to have died “immediately prior” to the victim’s death. The question is whether the Statute establishes the order of death between the slayer and the victim for purposes of distributing both the victim and the slayer’s estate or whether the Statute merely ignores the slayer’s actual date of death for purposes of distributing the victim’s estate.

Nettie and Rupert Torrence were mother and. son. Prior to their deaths, each was the primary heir of the other. Mrs. Torrence was a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Quick v. United Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Porth v. PorthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Lynch v. NewsomCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Woolbert v. Kimble Glass, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1999
  3. Jeanette Page v. Ann H. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API