Legal Opinion

Magnet Bank, F.S.B. v. Barnette

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1992No. 20406PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal, the defendants and third-party plaintiffs assert that the trial court erred in dismissing their complaint. The basis for the trial court’s dismissal was that the third-party complaint was unrelated to the matters arising out of the original complaint. The court concluded that the third-party complaint did not meet the criteria of Rule 14 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure, which governs third-party actions. We disagree.

Rule 14(a) permits a defendant to bring a third-party complaint against “a person not a party to the action who is or may be liable to him for all or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shamblin v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Haynes v. City of NitroWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Bluefield Sash & Door Co. v. Corte Construction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. May's Family Centers, Inc. v. Goodman's, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  5. Monarch Life Insurance v. DonahueDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sheetz, Inc. v. Bowles Rice McDavid Graff & Love, PLLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Dan Cava v. National Union Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Walker v. Option One Mortgage Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Dan Cava v. National Union Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Dan Cava v. National Union Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API