Magnet Bank, F.S.B. v. Barnette
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this appeal, the defendants and third-party plaintiffs assert that the trial court erred in dismissing their complaint. The basis for the trial court’s dismissal was that the third-party complaint was unrelated to the matters arising out of the original complaint. The court concluded that the third-party complaint did not meet the criteria of Rule 14 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure, which governs third-party actions. We disagree.
Rule 14(a) permits a defendant to bring a third-party complaint against “a person not a party to the action who is or may be liable to him for all or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shamblin v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Haynes v. City of NitroWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
- Bluefield Sash & Door Co. v. Corte Construction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
- May's Family Centers, Inc. v. Goodman's, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Monarch Life Insurance v. DonahueDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sheetz, Inc. v. Bowles Rice McDavid Graff & Love, PLLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
- Dan Cava v. National Union Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- Walker v. Option One Mortgage Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
- Dan Cava v. National Union Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- Dan Cava v. National Union Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.