Speck v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
•CARR, Judge.
The appellants are charged, in separate •complaints, with resisting an officer in his attempt to execute a search warrant. Title 14, Sec. 402, Code 1940.
By agreement of counsel the two cases were tried jointly. The court, sitting without a j-ury, .rendered judgments of guilt against both. The appellants -are husband and wife.
The only question of material moment for -our review is whether or not the acts and conduct of the defendants -or either -of them constituted “resisting” or “opposing” within the contemplation of the statute, supra.
The search warrant authorized the officers…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Appling v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Pimple v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Crumpton v. NewmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HarrisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
- Patterson v. City of SylacaugaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
- Speck v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949