Legal Opinion

Speck v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1949No. 8 Div. 701PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

•CARR, Judge.

The appellants are charged, in separate •complaints, with resisting an officer in his attempt to execute a search warrant. Title 14, Sec. 402, Code 1940.

By agreement of counsel the two cases were tried jointly. The court, sitting without a j-ury, .rendered judgments of guilt against both. The appellants -are husband and wife.

The only question of material moment for -our review is whether or not the acts and conduct of the defendants -or either -of them constituted “resisting” or “opposing” within the contemplation of the statute, supra.

The search warrant authorized the officers…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Appling v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Pimple v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Crumpton v. NewmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  5. King v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
  2. Patterson v. City of SylacaugaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Speck v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API