Legal Opinion

Pimple v. King

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1926No. Docket No. 125PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

The defendants are traveling evangelists. They were convicted of resisting the execution of an ordinance and the order of the mayor of Alma, Michigan. The people’s testimony tends to show that the defendants began holding religious meetings on July 13, 1925, in Wright Park, a city park in Alma, Michigan. The park adjoins the Michigan Old People’s Masonic Home and Hospital. No formal permission was given by the city, but the meetings continued without objection until complaints came in of excessive noise and misuse of the park. The city commission- then decided to deny the use of the park to…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Buckley v. BaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. People v. PhilabaunMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. KelleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. PohlMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. PhilabaunMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API