Legal Opinion

Mendelsohn v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1942PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff, pursuant to leave granted below, from an order denying his motion to vacate and strike out the answer. The action is to recover on an insurance policy. An answer subscribed by Alexander & Green, as attorneys for defendant, was duly served and filed. It is claimed that since neither Alexander nor Green is alive, the appearance and *153answer is a nullity. Plaintiff does not seek to put the defendant in default. He asks this court to grant the motion to vacate the answer with leave to defendant to appear and answer without terms. Defendant is not heard to complain of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Caplan v. CaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Caswell v. . HazardNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Bailly v. BettiNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. McFarland v. CraryNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  5. Blake v. BarnesNew York Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gignilliat v. Gignilliat, Savitz & Bettis, L.L.P.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Siddall v. KeatingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  3. Golub v. Perrin (In Re Perrin)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  4. Phillips v. Cahill Gordon & ReindelNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Blau v. LehmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API