Blau v. Lehman
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Douglas, with whom The Chief Justice concurs,
dissenting.
What the Court does today is substantially to eliminate “the great Wall Street trading firms” from the operation of § 16 (b), as Judge Clark stated in his dissent in the Court of Appeals. 286 F. 2d 786, 799. This result follows because of the wide dispersion of partners of investment banking firms among our major corporations. Lehman Bros, has partners on 100 boards. Under today’s *415ruling that firm can make a rich harvest on the “inside information” which § 16 of the Act covers because each partner need account only for his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Toucey v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Girouard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mosser v. DarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.