Legal Opinion
State v. Singer
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 27, 1997No. 1 CA-CR 96-0403, 1 CA-CR 96-0701PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
Richard H. Singer (“defendant”) appeals from the Maricopa County Superior Court’s judgments that Phoenix, Ariz. City Code (“P.C.C.”) section 8-2 (1962) is not unconstitutionally vague, thereby upholding similar determinations by the Phoenix Municipal Court. For the reasons which follow, we also affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 1993, the defendant was convicted in Phoenix Municipal Court of violating P.C.C. section 8-2 by keeping a dog which was in the habit of barking or howling, or disturbing the peace and quiet of any person, a class 1 misdemeanor. The case was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re BushmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. HolcombeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Town of Baldwin v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- State v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. McMahonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.