Legal Opinion

United States v. Jackson

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 8, 2008No. 07-2510PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DYK, Circuit Judge.

David Jackson (“Jackson”) appeals from his conviction, under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e), as a felon in possession of a firearm. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(a)(2), Jackson entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving the right to appeal the district court’s underlying decision on Jackson’s motion to suppress. Jackson sought to suppress several incriminating statements that he made to the police and guns discovered as a result of those statements, alleging that the statements were taken in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. FaustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. VerdugoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Candelario-SantanaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API