Legal Opinion

City of Muskogee v. Klotz

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 7, 1930No. 18985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LESTER, Y.

C. J. Lyman E. Klotz brought suit in the district court of Muskogee county, Okla., to compel through a writ of mandamus the payment by the city of Muskogee and its officers a one-third of a certain judgment that ■ plaintiff had previously obtained against the city of Muskogee in the United States Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma.

The judgment that was obtained in the federal court against the city was on the alleged grounds that the city, by its tortious action, had invalidated certain street improvement bonds alleged to have been owned and in possession of the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barney v. Baltimore CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Williams v. NottawaSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Farmington v. PillsburySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Miller & Lux, Inc. v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Bernards Township v. StebbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ohio Oil Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  2. Ohio Oil Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API