Legal Opinion
United States v. Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Mission Indians of Santa Ynez Reservation
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 4, 1997No. CV 97-1716 JSLPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION,
LETTS, District Judge.
The United States has brought this civil action seeking injunctive relief against nine defendant Indian tribes. * The tribes are alleged to operate gambling machines and engage in other forms of gambling which are illegal under 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2721 (the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”)), 18 U.S.C. § 1166(a) (“ § 1166”), and 15 U.S.C. § 1175 (the “Johnson Act”).
IGRA and § 1166 were passed together as Public Law 100-497 in 1988. Because they serve distinct purposes,' however, in this opinion they are defined…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of Alabama v. PCI Gaming AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Florida v. Seminole Tribe of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Texas v. Ysleta Del Sur PuebloDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2002
- Alabama v. PCI Gaming AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2014
- Wisconsin v. Stockbridge-Munsee CommunityDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.