Legal Opinion

Burgess Bros. v. Stewart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1920PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Without passing upon the merits of the controversy and following the usual policy of this court on appeals from orders granting injunctions pendente lite, we think that the issues presented by the pleadings should be heard and determined at a trial, and that we should not attempt to decide them upon affidavits. It appears that the case has been reached upon the calendar, and trial may be had immediately. It is only where, accepting plaintiff’s version of the facts so far as there is dispute respecting the same, it seems clear that he is not entitled to the relief sought, *914that the court will…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. P. Reardon, Inc. v. CatonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  2. Greene v. FaberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Biber Bros. News Co. v. New York Evening Post, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Munzer v. BlaisdellNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  3. In re the Estate of BroganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API