Strickland v. General Building & Masonry Contractors, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Defendants present two questions for our determination. First, they contend that plaintiff’s notice of lien is invalid because it fails to specify the exact date of the first furnishing of labor and materials. Plaintiff’s notice states only that the stonework was last furnished “in February 1973”. However, we do not deem it necessary to discuss this contention inasmuch as our treatment of the second contention is dispositive of the appeal.
Defendants next contend that plaintiff’s lien is invalid because the notice and claim of lien was not filed within 120 days after the last…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Priddy v. KERNERSVILLE LUMBER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
3Cited by12 opinions
- Precision Walls, Inc. v. CramptonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1996
- Cameron & Barkley Co. v. American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Preferred Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Royal Garden Resort, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Beach & Adams Builders, Inc. v. Northwestern BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Brown v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.