Legal Opinion

Union Bond & Mortgage Co. v. Brown

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1936No. File No. 7924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

The case is now here on a motion by the defendant H. P. Brown to dismiss the appeal as to him, in so far as it purports to be an appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial. 'So far as material to this motion, the facts are substantially as follows: Plaintiff commenced its action in circuit court to foreclose a certain mortgage upon property located in Beadle county. The named defendants in this action, among others, are the appellant A. PI. Brown, and also H. P. Brown, the person who is here making this motion to dismiss the appeal. In the action below the trial court entered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fuller v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Lucey v. VilhauerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Sutton v. Consolidated Apex Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Crouch v. Dakota, W. & M. R. R.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Fergen v. LonieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Millard v. BakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Wallace v. BrendeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Union Bond & Mortgage Co. v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Union Bond & Mortgage Co. v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API