Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Bilzerian
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 13, 2010No. Civil Action 89-1854 (RCL)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter now comes before the Court on Earnest Haire’s (“Haire”) Motion [1058] for Sanctions for Puma and Bilzerian’s Failure to Comply with the Court’s May 11, 2009, and August 12, 2009 Orders. 1 Also before the Court are the motions of movants Haire [998, 999] and Geoffrey Todd Hodges (“Hodges”) [1001] for an order holding Haircut LLLP (“Haircut”), David E. Hammer (“Hammer”), the Puma Foundation (“Puma”), Paul A. Bilzerian (“Bilzerian”), and Terri L. Steffen (“Steffen”) in civil contempt for failure to comply with the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Broderick, Catherine v. Donaldson, WilliamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, GaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Levin v. Tiber Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BilzerianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Agudas Chasidei Chabad of United States v. Russian FederationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BilzerianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Breen v. TuckerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Agudas Chasidei Chabad of United States v. Russian FederationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.