Nagel v. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Sullivan, J., entered June 29, 1914, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for equitable relief, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action was instituted against Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie, a corporation, Wilbur S. Yearsley, its vice president, and Kenneth Murry, its secretary, for the purpose of compelling the officers of the corporation to transfer to *100the plaintiff upon the books of the corporation twelve and one-half shares of its capital stock. After the issues were framed, the cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment directing that the shares of stock be transferred upon the books of the corporation to the plaintiff. From this judgment, the defendants have appealed.
The facts are as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Telegraph Co. v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Loring v. Salisbury MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Geyser-Marion Gold-Min. Co. v. StarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- St. Romes v. Levee Steam Cotton Press Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hagan v. Continental National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baxter v. Boston-Pacific Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Richardson v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Finley v. CurleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Zoratti v. West Coast Finance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- Wilson v. MearsWashington Supreme Court · 1919