Legal Opinion

Rauschenberger v. Mutual Benefit Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1949No. Appeal, 215PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

This is an appeal from the refusal of a new trial following a directed verdict for defendant in an assumpsit suit by plaintiff, the appellant, against a fire insurance company, the appellee.

On July 13, 1946, the defendant insurance company issued a written fire insurance policy on appellant’s garage. The term of the policy was for one year. It had been obtained by appellant, the owner, through Merle A. McKee, a local soliciting agent of the insurance company. Appellant averred that at the expiration of its term McKee orally agreed to continue the policy…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rossi v. Firemen's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Harris v. Meyers (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Benner v. Fire Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Russ to Use v. Metro L. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Ripka v. Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Insurance Commissioner of CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Pa. Nat'l Mc Ins. v. Ins. Comm., Com. of Pa.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API