Rauschenberger v. Mutual Benefit Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,
This is an appeal from the refusal of a new trial following a directed verdict for defendant in an assumpsit suit by plaintiff, the appellant, against a fire insurance company, the appellee.
On July 13, 1946, the defendant insurance company issued a written fire insurance policy on appellant’s garage. The term of the policy was for one year. It had been obtained by appellant, the owner, through Merle A. McKee, a local soliciting agent of the insurance company. Appellant averred that at the expiration of its term McKee orally agreed to continue the policy…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rossi v. Firemen's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Harris v. Meyers (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Benner v. Fire Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Russ to Use v. Metro L. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Ripka v. Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Insurance Commissioner of CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Pa. Nat'l Mc Ins. v. Ins. Comm., Com. of Pa.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988