Legal Opinion

Schott v. Schott

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 15, 2016No. 1 CA-CV 14-0685-FCUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE In re the Matter of: DANIELLE SCHOTT, Petitioner/Appellee, v. RICHARD SCHOTT, Respondent/Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV 14-0685 FC FILED 3-15-2016 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. FC2012-051988 The Honorable Suzanne E. Cohen, Judge AFFIRMED COUNSEL The Harrian Law Firm, PLC, Glendale By Daniel S. Riley Counsel for Petitioner/Appellee Stewart & Lane, PLC, Phoenix By Dianne…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Glaze v. MarcusCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. Abrams v. Horizon Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Craig v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API