Legal Opinion

Camarotta v. Kling

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 18, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

The defendant seeks to have the finding corrected by striking out substantially all of the paragraphs covering matters which were in dispute and substituting numerous paragraphs of the draft-finding, the result of which would leave the judgment without material support in the facts found and require a contrary conclusion to that reached by the trial court. It would be rare indeed that a finding could properly be attacked in this manner, and we have heretofore called attention to the violation of good practice and of our rules involved in such an attempt to procure the substitution of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Rozycki v. Yantic Grain & Products Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  3. Gallaher v. Southern New , England Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Palmer v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gage v. Chapin Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Mathis v. BzdulaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  3. Barry v. LeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Schuster v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  5. Vecchiarelli v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API