Legal Opinion

State v. Ortiz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 4, 2012No. SC 18946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

40 A.3d 785 (2012)

304 Conn. 914

STATE of Connecticut

v.

Akov ORTIZ.

SC 18946

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided April 4, 2012.

Pamela S. Nagy, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 133 Conn.App. 118, 33 A.3d 862, is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Should this court overrule State v. Pommer, 110 Conn.App. 608, 955 A.2d 637, cert, denied, 289 Conn. 951, 961 A.2d 418 (2008), which holds that the act of preventing someone from giving a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PommerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. State v. OrtizConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. State v. BoutilierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BoutilierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  2. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API