Legal Opinion
(PC) Howell v. Schubert
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 16, 2021No. 2:19-cv-00266Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAREEM J. HOWELL, No. 2: 19-cv-0266 KJM KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. AMENDED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 ANN MARIE SCHUBERT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 14, 2020, the undersigned recommended that defendants’ 19 motion to dismiss be granted. (ECF No. 35.) On December 28, 2020, defendants filed objections 20 to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 36.) 21 Based on the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Muhammad v. CloseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.