Legal Opinion

Sheen v. Sheen

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 24, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainants are a brother and nephew of the late Thomas G. Sheen, who died testate. They seek a construction of decedent's will, so that a trust therein created may be declared void, resulting in intestacy as to the trust fund, and that the residuary estate pass in accordance with the terms of a certain agreement made between the complainants and decedent's widow, rather than in accordance with the intestate laws of New Jersey.

The widow, a sister, the executors and trustees of decedent's estate, and the attorney-general are defendants, all of whom have answered, with the exception of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. MacKenzie v. Trustees of the PresbyterySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
  2. Noice v. SchnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of the Fifth Avenue BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  4. In re the Estate of SkuseNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  5. Hesketh v. MurphySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Woodstown National Bank, C., Co. v. SnelbakerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  2. Mirinda v. KingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. United California Bank v. MoskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Estate of McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Burke v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API