Legal Opinion

Retseck v. Fowler State Bank

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 2003No. 04A03-0205-CV-160PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Lisa Retseck appeals from the trial court's order that Lisa is not an "intended [sic] beneficiary" of the Last Will and Testament of Myrtle Avery ("Will"). Appellant's Appendix at 10. 1 She presents one issue for our review, whether a class was created in which Lisa is a member. In its brief, the Trust requests that it be awarded attorney fees. 2

We affirm.

Myrtle Avery ("Myrtle") had two sons, Robert and Maurice. On August 25, 1967, she executed a will in which she divided her estate into halves, bequeathing half of the estate to Maurice and appointing him trustee over a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of WalzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Beck v. Dickinson, Exr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Hershberger v. LuzaderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Epply v. KnechtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carlson v. Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes & PagosIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Carlson v. Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes & PagosIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. In Re Boelson TrustIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. University of Southern Indiana Foundation v. BakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API