State v. Ou
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.
¶1 A jury convicted Sal Ou of knowingly making a false or misleading material statement to a police officer in violation of RCW 9A.76.175. Ou contends the State had to charge him with refusal to give a name or address, or giving a false name or address, under the specific statute of RCW 46.61.020, instead of charging him under what he describes as the concurrent general statute of RCW 9A.76.175. Because refusal to give a name and address, or giving a false name or address, in violation of RCW *90146.61.020 is not a statute that is concurrent with knowingly making a false or misleading material…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. DanforthWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. ShrinerWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. JessupCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- State v. ConteWashington Supreme Court · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Scott Jesus BarajasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- State Of Washington, Respondent/cross-app. V. Daniel Joseph Widders, Sr., Appellant/cross- Resp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2025
- State Of Washington, V. Guang Zheng & Dan YuCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021