Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kovacs v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 21, 2015No. 32473-7-IIIPublished

1DissentFearing, J.

¶17 (dissenting)

What a difference a day makes. Twenty-four little hours.

Dinah Washington, What a Diff’rence a Day Makes (Mercury Records 1959).

¶18 The Department of Labor and Industries (DLI) ignores a critical word in the controlling statute, snubs a *941companion statute, promotes old bad dicta rather than new good dicta, and shuns the liberality intended for worker compensation statutes. I would affirm the trial court’s ruling and therefore dissent. Principles of statutory construction and the public policy of protecting injured workers compel a ruling that John Kovacs timely filed his worker…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Christensen v. EllsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Christensen v. EllsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Johnson v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. Lowy v. PeaceHealthWashington Supreme Court · 2012

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API