Legal Opinion

Greenawalt v. State Farm Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 5, 1991No. 1-88-3177PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

Plaintiff, Patricia Greenawalt, appeals from a judgment entered on the pleadings in favor of defendant, State Farm Insurance Co., in an action seeking a declaratory judgment as to State Farm’s obligations pursuant to the uninsured motorist provision of an automobile policy issued to plaintiff and her husband (the Policy). The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly granted State Farm’s motion for judgment on the pleadings based on its determination that State Farm’s obligation under its uninsured motorist provision was offset and fully satisfied by the joint tortfeasor’s…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Glidden v. Farmers Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Putnam v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lanier v. Associates Finance, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Stryker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Wilhelm v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hoglund v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Banes v. Western States Ins. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. TrujilloAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  4. Zdeb v. Allstate Insurance CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. Otto Baum Co. v. Süd Family Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API