Legal Opinion
Purdy v. Humphrey
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1947PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBatt, J.
This is a motion under rules 106 and 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss each cause of action alleged in the third amended complaint herein on the following grounds as to the defendants Wolcott J. Humphrey and Edwin R. Gott:
*311(a) The cause of action did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement of an action thereon.(b) It does not appear that the plaintiff was a stockholder at the time of the transaction or transactions complained of or that his stock thereafter devolved upon him by operation of law; and in addition that the first, sixth, seventh and eighth causes…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Keys v. LeopoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Potter v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Mills v. . MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Gottfried v. GottfriedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Burkin & KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Aliotta v. SamperisiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Purdy v. HumphreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948