Legal Opinion

Guill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 24, 1912No. 1277Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON EEHEAEING.

April 24, 1912.

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

At a former day of this term this cause was affirmed, as shown by the opinion then rendered.

Thereafter appellant made such a clear showing as to entitle him to a certiorari to perfect the record, which was done. It now appears that the bills of exceptions which the first record showed had not been filed at all, were actually filed and in term time. A properly certified copy of the statement of facts now appears instead of the original, as was the case before. However, the statement of facts shows clearly that it was agreed to and signed by the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Kutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  3. Shaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Suit v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891
  5. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API