Lutz v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
The trial court, after a bench trial, found appellant, Annabelle L. Lutz, guilty of sexual solicitation. D.C.Code 1973, § 22-2701. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion for judgment of acquittal based on her theory that a constitutional right of privacy protects solicitation for prostitution in a private area between two consenting adults. We hold that the constitutional right of privacy does not protect commercial sexual solicitation. Accordingly, we affirm.
I
On the evening of May 1, 1980, Officers Miller Millard Smith, Jr., and William H.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cherry v. KochNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Thompson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Blyther v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. GreenOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.