Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Halbert

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 20, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

Whereas this court has on some past occasions felt no little impatience with determinations limiting the scope of judicial notice to a point which would fossilize the judiciary into a group of singularly unintelligent morons, it is presently unprepared to affirm the thesis of respondents in this proceeding of a presumption of law to the effect that any person of Scotch birth or descent intends that his testamentary fiduciaries shall be recompensed at a rate less than that provided by law. It is, of course, a truism that a testamentary document is to be construed in accordance with…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Laytin v. . DavidsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Phoenix v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of WilletsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Olcott v. . BaldwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of McCaffertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  2. In re the Estate of CostelloNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. In Re Kelley's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Foot v. KelleyMontana Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API