Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Arbogast v. Mohn

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1979No. 14531, 14571PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGraw, Justice:

These cases, one an appeal on writ of error, and the other a petition for habeas corpus, are consolidated for our determination since they both present similar basic issues. The major issue is: should a criminal defendant be allowed the benefit of a statutory amendment which was not in effect at the time the offense was committed but which was in effect at the time of conviction and sentencing, where the amendment has the effect of reducing the offense from a felony to a misdemeanor and where the defendant did not elect to be sentenced under the new law prior to conviction?…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. OliverNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. People v. HollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State Ex Rel. Strickland v. MeltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Riley v. ZieglerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. PayneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. EastonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re Stephen Tyler R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. ChrismanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. Matter of HeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API