Legal Opinion

Boohaker v. Trott

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 20, 1962No. 8 Div. 103PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Justice.

The complaint below was in a single common count and claimed $1365.00 for work and labor done.

The defendant filed a sworn plea questioning the jurisdiction of the court below. A demurrer to this plea being sustained, issue was joined on a plea of the general issue, and an additional plea in short by consent, with leave, etc.

The action of the court in sustaining the plaintiff’s demurrer to the sworn plea going to the jurisdiction of the court below is not raised in this appeal.

The evidence shows that the defendant below, who is the appellant here, and who for convenience will…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fuller v. . KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Canton Union Coal Co. v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Hand Lumber Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. Ex Parte Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. White Dairy Co. v. SimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. WoolfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Allison v. Acton-Etheridge Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Alabama Power Company v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  4. State v. BarnhillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  5. Elmore County Com'n v. RagonaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API