Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Dougherty, J., Aplt. v. Heller, K.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 14, 2016No. 6 EAP 2015Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Judge STRASSBURGER,
concurring and dissenting.
I join in Parts I (Background), II (Temporary Judicial Assignments to the Supreme Court), and IV (Application of the Collateral Order Doctrine) of the Majority Opinion. I would not reach Part III (The Sustainability of the Dismissal Order).
*542A. Collateral Order Doctrine
I have long advocated a strict application of the collateral order doctrine. See, e.g., Strausser Enterprises, Inc. v. Segal & Morel, Inc., 89 A.3d 292, 299-300 (Pa.Super.2014) (citing Calabrese v. Collier Twp. Mun. Auth., 432 Pa. 360, 248 A.2d 236, 238 (1968) (O’Brien, J., dissenting)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Hession Condemnation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, N.A. v. KesslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Calabrese v. Collier Township Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Strausser Enterprises, Inc. v. Segal & Morel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014