Legal Opinion

Greene v. National Surety Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1926No. 19824. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— This action is based upon a supersedeas bond. The trial resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law and a judgment sustaining plaintiff’s right to recover in the sum of five thousand dollars, this being the penal sum mentioned in the bond. From this judgment, the defendant appeals.

No statement of facts or bill of exceptions has been brought to this court, and therefore the only question in the case is whether the findings support the judgment.

In Greene v. Levmson, 123 Wash. 370, 212 Pac. 659, a judgment was entered against the Manhattan Investment Company and another defendant, from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greene v. LevinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Garney v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lejeune v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  2. DeBenedictis v. HagenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  3. Mattice v. DundenWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. In re LevinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1927
  5. Foltz v. MansonWashington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API