Legal Opinion

Mattice v. Dunden

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1938No. 26836. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

This action was instituted by plaintiff to recover possession of an automobile. In his complaint, he alleges that he is the owner of and entitled to possession of a certain described automobile, which was on the 12th day of August, 1936, taken by defendants without his knowledge or consent.

In their answer and cross-complaint, defendants, besides making a general denial, allege that defendant Marjory Dunden is administratrix of the estate of Dorothy I. Wittwer, deceased, and is the owner of the automobile in her capacity as administratrix.

The action was tried to the court, sitting without a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Coleman v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Kitts v. WillsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Interstate Savings & Loan Ass'n v. KnappWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Boothe v. BassettWashington Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Lejeune v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  3. State v. WadeWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. WadeWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. DeBenedictis v. HagenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API