Legal Opinion

Pfefer v. Board of Police Commissioners

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1983No. WD 33991PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

This case presents the question of whether respondent, a police officer of the Kansas City, Missouri Police Department, acquired the status of permanent appointment after service as a probationary officer for a term of six months. At issue is the entitlement of respondent to a public hearing and removal only for cause, a condition not applicable to officers serving on probationary appointment. The trial court ruled that respondent had achieved the position of permanent appointment and was thus immune from summary discharge. We agree.

The facts of the case were essentially…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Person v. Scullin Steel CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. Parmer v. BeanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. State Ex Rel. Griffin v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  4. Eminence R-1 School District v. HodgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  5. State Board of Registration Ex Rel. Healing Arts v. FinchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Holmes v. Kansas City Missouri Board of Police CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Polytech, Inc. v. Affiliated Fm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. Click v. Board of Police CommissionersDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
  4. State ex rel. Nixon v. KoonceMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. PattersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API