Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. International Shoe Company

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 25, 1970No. 8 Div. 1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADLEY, Judge.

Plaintiff filed his complaint under the .Uniform Sales Act in 1964 for breach • of warranty and negligence in the. inspection and sale of a shoe. After four years of pleadings (four amended complaints’ with demurrers sustained to each) appellant took a voluntary non-suit on February 7, 1968, and appealed to the Supreme Court. The case was subsequently transferred to - this court.

Appellant’s complaints, considered together, alleged .that he purchased a shoe with a tack protruding through, or imbedded in, the sole. As a result, he was injured and .seeks damages therefor.

There…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Idzykowski v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Nashua River Paper Co. v. LindsayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Smith v. Pizitz of Bessemer, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. Webb v. LitzAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ronald Basil Hart, Jr. v. Yamaha-Parts Distributors, Inc., Yamaha International Corporation, Yamaha Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Barrington Corp. v. Patrick Lumber Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. Dold v. SherowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Treadwell Ford, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Redman Industries v. BinkeyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API