Legal Opinion
Heimann v. Kinder-Morgan CO2 Co.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 8, 2006No. 25,735PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} In this case we determine the scope of an arbitration clause contained in a 1998 settlement agreement between Plaintiffs, a class of carbon dioxide royalty owners, and Defendant, Kinder Morgan C02 Company, L.P., a working interest owner. Kinder Morgan appeals a district court order denying its motion to compel arbitration. We entertain this appeal pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 44-7-19(A)(1) (1971) (repealed 2001) (current version at NMSA 1978, § 44-7A-29(a)(l) (2001)), and we affirm.
BACKGROUND
{2} Plaintiffs own royalties in the Bravo Dome Carbon Dioxide Unit, a carbon…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Continental Potash, Inc. v. Freeport-McMoran, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Azar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Shaeffer v. KeltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Starko, Inc. v. PRESBYTERIAN HEALTH PLANNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Anderson Living Trust v. Conocophillips Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- Bhasker v. Kemper Cas. Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
- Starko, Inc. v. Presbyterian Health Plan, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- DEPT. OF SECURITIES EX REL. FAUGHT v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.