Legal Opinion

Paul Trunnell v. Verna Fergel

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2012No. 37984Published

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Chief Justice.

This case comes before this Court on an appeal from the district court’s ruling against Paul Trunnell and Bill Lomu’s (collectively “Trunnell”) Complaint and Petition for Injunctive Relief. The complaint alleged the existence of a public road on Verna Fergel’s (Fergel) property, and that Fergel had denied access to the road causing damage to Trunnell. The district court held that Fergel was a bona fide purchaser for value, and that she did not have actual or constructive notice of the public nature of the road when she purchased the property. We reverse and remand.

I.FACT…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Borah v. McCandlessIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Weitz v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Akers v. D.L. White Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Lane Ranch Partnership v. City of Sun ValleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Farrell v. Board of Com'rs, Lemhi CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API