Legal Opinion
State v. Patricelli
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 14, 1982No. 82-684PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
This is a pretrial appeal by the state pursuant to Minn.R.Crim.P. 29.03 from an order of the district court suppressing evidence in the prosecution of defendant on a charge of aggravated robbery. The district court suppressed the evidence, a statement, on the ground that it was the fruit of an illegal arrest of defendant at the house of a friend. Specifically, the court ruled (a) that although police had a warrant, the warrant was defective (b) that absent a valid warrant the arrest was unlawful under Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 100 S.Ct. 1371, 63 L.Ed.2d 639…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. MorseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State v. PatricelliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Byrd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.