Roland v. Krazy Glue, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff appeals from the denial of a motion for new trial on the ground of inadequacy of damages. We reverse and remand.
Plaintiff purchased a tube of glue sold by defendant through a local drug store. While applying pressure to expel the glue, a seam at the unopened end of the tube ruptured. Glue splashed into plaintiff's left eye. The eye was immediately irrigated and she was transported to a hospital. She suffered excruciating pain from burns to the cornea of her eye. Her eye was irrigated with a saline solution throughout the night, in the hospital. She was given anti-inflammatory and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Carlisle v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Alabama Power Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Jones v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. HumphriesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Allen v. ZickosAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Varner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Orr v. HammondCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- American Legion Post No. 57 v. LeaheySupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Lartigue v. FlemingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Biddle v. ChatelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.