Legal Opinion

Roland v. Krazy Glue, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 9, 1977No. Civ. 978PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff appeals from the denial of a motion for new trial on the ground of inadequacy of damages. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff purchased a tube of glue sold by defendant through a local drug store. While applying pressure to expel the glue, a seam at the unopened end of the tube ruptured. Glue splashed into plaintiff's left eye. The eye was immediately irrigated and she was transported to a hospital. She suffered excruciating pain from burns to the cornea of her eye. Her eye was irrigated with a saline solution throughout the night, in the hospital. She was given anti-inflammatory and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carlisle v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Jones v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. HumphriesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Allen v. ZickosAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Varner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  2. Orr v. HammondCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. American Legion Post No. 57 v. LeaheySupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. Lartigue v. FlemingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  5. Biddle v. ChatelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API