Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Schnackenberg
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 29, 1969PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
Lee J. Schnackenberg (hereinafter sometimes called the defendant) was tried on two indictments, one charging larceny by false pretences of more than $100 of the property of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority (Authority), and the other charging conspiracy to commit larceny of over $100. A codefendant, Highway Traffic Engineers, Inc. (HTE), was joined in each indictment. Two officers of HTE, Thomas D. Connolly and Edgar F. Copell, were named as coconspirators, but not as defendants, in the conspiracy indictment. Verdicts of guilty on both indictments were returned against the defendants…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. HoffaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Attorney General v. TuftsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Commonwealth v. BeckettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. WatsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. NelsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. GagnonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.