Legal Opinion

People v. Dessis-Carbuccia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The eavesdropping warrant was supported by probable cause because it was based upon lengthy affidavits and pen registers detailing defendants’ involvement in narcotics activity which was corroborated by police surveillance (see, People v Tambe, 71 NY2d 492, 501; People v Bigelow, 66 NY2d 417, 423). The court’s translation procedures were proper and the court offered defense counsel the opportunity to provide their own translation. Under these circumstances the court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the transcripts (see, People v Kuss, 81…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BigelowNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. TambeNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. People v. KussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. SotoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. People v. Dessis-CarbucciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API