Legal Opinion
People v. Soto
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 13, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant Humberto Soto’s contention that the indictment must be dismissed because it was the product of a defective Grand Jury proceeding is without merit. Specifically, he claims that the indictment had been filed by a Grand Jury whose term had expired and had not been extended by court order (see, CPL 190.15 [1]). This issue has not been preserved for our review (see, CPL 210.20 [2]; 255.20; People v Lawrence, 64 NY2d 200). Were we to reach the issue, we would find that the claim has no merit. The record establishes that the Grand Jury had been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. KussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. GandyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. Dessis-CarbucciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. DuncanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. TaylorNew York Supreme Court · 2001
- GARCIA, FRANK, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.