Legal Opinion

City of Wichita v. Sealpak Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 3, 2005No. 91,748PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

NUSS, J.:

In 2002 the City of Wichita (City) acquired real property owned by Sealpak Company, Inc., (Sealpak) through condemnation. The City appeals the district court’s exclusion from evidence of a statement made by Sealpak’s owner in a 2000 property tax appeal concerning the value of Sealpak’s land. Our jurisdiction arises under K.S.A. 26-504, which allows direct appeals to the Supreme Court from any final order in an eminent domain proceeding.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court erred in excluding Smith’s statements. Because we hold…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. MeeksSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  2. Welton v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  4. City of Wichita v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. State v. DreilingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sola-Morales v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State ex rel. Schmidt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  3. Griffin v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. Miller v. GLACIER DEVELOPMENT CO., LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Mooney v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API