Legal Opinion

Consolidated School Dist. No. 2 v. Arlington School Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 5, 1931No. 19968PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.

This is an action originally brought in the district court of Craig county by Arlington School Supply Company against consolidated .school district No. 2, Craig county, Okla., to recover upon a contract) for the purchase price of certain automobile bus bodies sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant. These bodies were placed on chassis of automobile buses and were used by the district in conveying pupils to and from school.

The school district defended on the ground that the contract sired on was void. Trial was to the court, resulting in a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

Defendant seeks to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buxton Skinner Stationery v. Bd. of Com'rs of CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Union School District No. 1. v. Foster Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Town of Covington v. Antrim Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Protest of Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. Gulf Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Western Paint Chemical Co. v. Board of Cty. Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Protest of St Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. State Ex Rel. First State Bank v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. Roland v. Board of Com'rs of Carter CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API