Legal Opinion
Shakesnider v. Rosenfeld
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 25, 1958No. 2177PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellants, husband and wife, were sued as the makers of a promissory note for the balance due thereon. Judgment went against them and they have appealed.
The facts are largely undisputed. Appellants borrowed $3,750.12 from a local bank and gave their note therefor, pledging as collateral security their savings account and the titles to six ice-cream trucks. Default in payment occurred in June 1951 when the balance due was $3,149.34. Presumably the deposit in the savings account was applied toward payment of the note, but no effort appears to have been made to realize on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Steele v. General Baking Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
- Berch Ex Rel. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. RosnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
3Cited by19 opinions
- Frazier v. Center Motors, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hackney v. SheeskinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Wells v. WynnDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Sitwell v. Government Employees Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Christian v. BrunoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.